|
|
||||
Create bottom line savings for our clients by improving employee retention, productivity, satisfaction, honesty and ethics via premiere employee selection practices. |
||||
|
To provide high quality, Internet-based pre-employment assessments that systematically and accurately identify the highest quality candidates. |
||||
|
InfiNet matches JOBS to PEOPLE. Using cutting-edge science and efficiency, InfiNet Assessment helps clients to reduce turnover, improve employee productivity and job satisfaction, leading to impressive bottom-line savings. InfiNet prides itself on being a full-service assessment and selection provider. InfiNet has the experience and expertise to handle all phases of the employee selection process: · Identify character and skill requirements for target positions · Design and develop assessments to evaluate candidates against criteria · Validate assessments against job performance · Train and support test administrators · Provide on-going support and consultation InfiNet’s clients range from small, single-site companies to
multinational Fortune 50 corporations. InfiNet designs, develops and
supports selection systems for all major industry groups, including:
When Bottom Line Savings Count, Choose Infinet Assessment! Bottom line savings is the difference between Infinet and other test providers. Infinet has consistently developed employee testing and selection tools that set industry standards in accuracy, consistency, fairness, reliability, validity, ease of use, client support, and value. Client Focus One of Infinet’s primary goals is to exceed our clients’ expectations. We accomplish this by listening carefully to our customers and responding to their unique needs. This emphasis on quality and commitment has resulted in continued, long-term business relationships, repeat customers, and a superior reputation. We strongly believe that our success hinges on our superior client support and service; and we are fully committed to continuing this focus with all of our current and future clients. |
||||
|
|
||||
|
"The closest to perfection a person ever comes is when he (or she) fills out a job application form." Stanley J. Randall |
||||
|
Applications, resumes, diplomas and background references are often vague, misleading and unreliable. Thus, they may be poor criteria on which to base hiring decisions. A new and reliable solution for hiring the best available candidates is needed. What is needed is a cost-effective means to verify that the job candidate possesses high integrity, has the required job skills, and is likely to remain with the company. |
||||
|
What are the benefits of InfiNet’s
assessments? Results to clients using Infinet’s assessment
systems have consistently shown: ·
25% to 35% increase in retention ·
25% reduction in number of interviews conducted
·
Decreased absences and tardiness ·
Improved employee performance ·
Decreased training periods ·
Reduced shrinkage in retail
operations
There are certain legal trends that strongly support the use
of pre-employment assessment to demonstrate to the world and the
courts that the employer has taken appropriate steps to protect it’s
customers and coworkers. Employers are dealing with an
ever-increasing number of negligent hiring lawsuits that seek
redress for crimes committed by their own employees. Those
crimes range from the homicide of a customer and an assault on his
family in his own home by deliverymen employed by an auction house
to assaults, rapes, and theft against co-workers as well as
customers. These lawsuits contend that an employer negligently placed an
individual with dangerous tendencies, which should have been
uncovered by a reasonable investigation and assessment, into an
employment situation where it was foreseeable that this individual
posed a threat of injury to others. Employers cannot legally
ask questions such as, "How frequently do you fly into a psychotic
rage?" However, they can reduce their legal exposure through
the responsible and uniform use of valid pre-employment
assessments. Valid and reliable
pre-employment assessments demonstrate a reasonable and necessary
investigation of the applicant's tendencies towards theft and/or
violent crimes. |
||||
Infinet Assessment is a member of the following Professional
Associations: Northern California Human Resource Association (NCHRA) HR ExecNet Founding Member – Dr. John Schinnerer
|
||||
|
|
With respect to pre-employment assessments, validity is an objective
measure that demonstrates that the test actually measures what it purports to
measure. Validation is a study sponsored by the test publisher in accordance
with certain professional standards. Typically, these standards include
"Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing” and “Principles for the
Validation and Use of Personnel Selection
Procedures.”
All of InfiNet’s assessment products and the conclusions reached by use
of them are designed and validated in accordance with the procedures described
in "Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing," as well as “Principles
for the Validation and Use of Personnel Selection Procedures.” Thus, none of our
assessments are, or have ever been, discriminatory. In addition, all our
assessments are in compliance with E.E.O.C. and other Federal Regulations.
In the "Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing,” validity is
described as “the most important consideration in test evaluation. The concept
refers to the appropriateness, meaningfulness, and usefulness of the specific
inferences made from test score. Test validation is the process of accumulating
evidence to support such inferences. A variety of inferences may be made from
scores produced by a given test, and there are many ways of accumulating
evidence to support any particular inference. Validity, however, is a unitary
concept. Although evidence may be accumulated in many ways, validity always
refers to the degree to which that evidence supports the inferences that are
made from the scores. The inferences regarding specific uses of a test are
validated, not the test itself.”
There are five forms of validity:
1. Construct validity
refers
to the extent to which dimensions, or constructs, with similar names on
different tests relate to one another. Two traits that correlate highly on a
personality test are not necessarily the same, but the high correlation provides
reassurance that they are both testing the same "construct" (e.g., honesty and
dependability, extraversion and sociability, etc.).
2. Concurrent
validity is that
approach whereby people who are successful in a given job at a particular
company or within a certain industry are evaluated by supervisors and grouped.
Usually they are put into groups such as Top Performers (i.e., top 25%), Average
Performers (i.e., middle 50%), and Below Average Performers (i.e., bottom
25%). The scores of the people who fit each of these ranges are then compiled
and Benchmark Standards of the Top Performers are used to hire, train or manage.
This is the type of validity most often used by InfiNet in the creation of
client Success Profiles.
3. Predictive validity
, or criterion validity, occurs when the employer hires people for a job via normal
hiring procedures (without the use of a validated pre-employment test) and,
simultaneously, has them complete the pre-employment test. The results from the
test are not used in the hiring decisions. The employees are followed for a
period of time; say 3-6 months, to track their progress. At the end of the
period, supervisors evaluate them. Benchmarks are established using the
supervisor ratings and the results of the pre-employment test. This approach
takes into account those who are still with the employer and whom the employer
considers successful. InfiNet used this approach with tremendous success (.83)
with UPS to develop Benchmark standards for package handlers.
4. Content validity represents job function testing,( i.e., typing, physical work endurance, etc.). Content validity is an appropriate strategy when the job is well defined through job analysis. This means correctly identifying the essential skills, tasks, and knowledge and the assessment or test is a representative sample of KSAs drawn from that domain.
5. Face validity This is the easiest form of validity as it tells us that, according to subject matter experts (SMEs), the test appears to measure what it is supposed to measure. For example, a typing test has high face validity as a measure of success for the position of executive administrator. InfiNet does not recommend using tests that only discuss their face validity. It is neither statistically sound nor defensible.
InfiNet recommends that all organizations maintain a consistent hiring
process when making personnel decisions. Information should be gathered in each
step of the hiring process to have reliable and measurable data to inform the
final hiring decision. The pre-employment assessment used should count no more
than thirty to forty percent of the hiring decisions. The face-to-face
interviews, reference check, education history, work experience and other
pertinent factors should be considered for the
remainder.